.

'Gorilla' on Loose as Barrington Boards Seek to Cage Spending

The Barrington Town Council, School Committee and Committee on Appropriations hold a joint meeting of the minds that got testy over slow start of bargaining with teachers' union.

They didn’t agree on a way to deal with Barrington’s 800-pound gorilla Monday evening. But they did give the Ad Hoc Budget Forecast Committee an additional charge to come up with ways to share services and resources to save money.

The gorilla is the teachers’ contract, which makes up the majority of Barrington’s operating budget. It ignited some sniping from the Committee on Appropriations at the joint session with the School Committee and Town Council in Town Hall.

“I am very concerned that you won’t be far enough along" about bargaining that has just gotten underway, said Kathy Cadigan, chair of the appropriations committee.

In past years, Cadigan said, negotiations got started much earlier in the budget season. The appropriations committee usually has had some inkling of what to expect by the second week of February, she said. Not this year with the first meaningful sessions being held in February. 

School Committee chair Robert Shea explained that the election season pushed off the process for several weeks as the school board reorganized, and then they didn’t select a negotiator to take the place of the superintendent on the bargaining team. That didn’t occur until a few weeks ago.

Cadigan said she estimated that there has been a nine-week delay from what was a typical time frame in the past. That would appear to make it very difficult to go to the Financial Town Meeting with a budget that takes into account the result of negotiations.

Tim Sweetser, vice chair of the appropriations committee, also questioned the delay. He said he still isn’t convinced that the School Committee understands the impact of the teachers’ contract on town spending.

“The eight-hundred pound gorilla is wages and benefits,” he said. 

Joel Hellmann, another member of the appropriations committee, asked the School Committee members if they have a sense of teacher salaries in other towns. 

“I did an analysis,” he said, based on salaries for teachers with 20 years on the job with a master’s degree and longevity pay.

“Barrington is by far the highest,” Hellmann said, “10 to 15 percent higher in some cases. Teachers generally start lower. But we’re paying significantly more – 9 to 10 percent for the average teacher.” 

The ad hoc budget forecast committee, which painted a rather dire picture of spending in Barrington last May if the status quo continues, will get its chance to try to save money.

The Town Council, which set up the committee, voted unanimously to charge it with coming up with specific recommendations to consolidate and share school and municipal services and resources. 

Town Councilor Bill DeWitt, who suggested that a subcommittee take on this responsibility, said: “Stripping out duplication is necessary. We need a subcommittee to take a meaningful look.”

Town Council President June Speakman suggested that the budget forecast committee take on that task. It probably won’t get started during this budget season, which has its own demand on time. But it will look at operations in time for next year. 

Ron Tarro, finance director for the schools, gave everyone an update on school buildings. He said a list of priorities for the $2.4 million that will be spent to rectify health and safety issues is being prepared. 

Tarro also reiterated that building a new middle school is estimated to be about $3 million less expensive than a “gut renovation” of the existing building -- $36 million versus $39 million. At the former expense, he said, about $1.8 million will be added to Barrington’s debt service each year for 20 years.

Given the 18 percent decline in enrollment that is projected over the next 10 years, Cadigan asked, is there any value in looking at other scenarios? Such as refurbishing Hampden Meadows and moving the fourth- and fifth-graders back into the other elementary schools? 

“Is there a Plan B?” asked Sweetser, so that Barrington doesn’t overbuild. “I would hate to build a beautiful new middle school and have half of the classrooms empty.” 

Tarro and School Committee member Patrick Guida both said that won’t happen. 

“The Rhode Island Department of Education won’t less us overbuild,” said Guida.

The joint meeting also included a briefing from Superintendent Michael Messore on the new five-year Strategic Plan for the schools, which focuses on "optimizing dollars for learning" and "making the best use of available resources."

But, Messore said, the Strategic Plan also recognizes that the “status quo is going to get us nowhere.” And that will involve additional spending on technology, professional development, and implementing the Common Core curriculum.

Town Manager Peter DeAngelis Jr. gave an update on the four municipal employee union contracts, which all agreed to put caps on benefits paid to retirees while getting roughly 2 percent wage hikes each year over the next three years.

“They all stepped up,” DeAngelis said of the police officers, firefighters, dispatchers and public works employees who all recognized the town's budget limitations.

Townie January 29, 2013 at 11:25 AM
"They all stepped up", quoted DeAngelis. No they did not. Here is a thought. As the economy has not rebounded, no raises this year for municipal or teachers, a 1% raise next year and 2% the year after. No new schools while enrollment is dropping. The gravy train is running on empty. Enough! No tax increase this year.
Townie January 29, 2013 at 01:07 PM
Messore wants additional spending of course. How about this: he can have as much additional spending as he wants as long as he finds offsets in his budget. Enrollment is down. Perhaps some teachers will need to be laid off. Middle school sports should be on the table. How many teachers aides does a district need? I'm sure the next quote we will hear is that the teachers "stepped up" also to get a 6% raise over the next three years. I for one have not had a raise in quite a while and there are no raises on the horizon because (News Flash) the economy is in the dumper.
Gary Morse January 29, 2013 at 01:52 PM
A piece in this equation is the longer term negative impact from the pension plan changes upping the retirement date for teachers. This was a transfer of so called pension plan savings as an added cost for municipal budgets. Teachers have had their pension retirement dates shifted higher which translates to longer time on the job and higher longevity payments over the long term. Property taxes are going to rise for many reasons, this being one of them. Thanks Joel for your excellent work in pulling together an analysis on behalf of the Appropriations Committee.
Manifold Witness January 29, 2013 at 02:31 PM
So this group has no power to cut taxes & spending? They only have the power to INCREASE taxes & spending every year? Same stale script every year. Add $1,800,000 of debt service every year for a new school? $441 per family of 4. Don't worry-the RI Dept of Ed won’t let them overspend?! Wait. Didn't RIDOE let health & safety issues be ignored for years? And there isn't even a “list of priorities for the $2.4 million" needed "to rectify" those issues?! RIDOE let this happen?! Or... who did? The Ad Hoc Budget Forecast Committee (their good past work ignored?) will “get its chance to try to save money” by “coming up with specific recommendations to consolidate and share school and municipal services and resources”? Municipalities don't want to cut costs by sharing services. June says it's too late anyway- “the budget forecast committee…probably won’t get started during this budget season... But it will look at operations in time for next year.” What?! Next year?! But ....the contracts will be done... no control over 85% of the budget... wait until we renegotiate... Teachers will pack the ol’ fashioned (vote-in-public–with-your-whole-body-in-front-of-your-kids’-teachers) Annual Meeting to vote themselves big salaries & benefits. Sell. Move. ‘Round & ‘round it goes. Who “stepped up”? Joel Hellmann did. It takes a lot of work to be able to give cogent conclusory statements about those numbers. Thank you, Joel.
Joel Hellmann January 29, 2013 at 02:31 PM
Gary I should show you the numbers at some point. They are very eye opening.
P. Dulchinos January 29, 2013 at 03:11 PM
Isn't our public school enrollment declining? The hard truth maybe we may have to reduce our foot print and administrative overhead -
Gary Morse January 29, 2013 at 03:20 PM
Thanks Joel! There is an irony here where homes at the top end in Barrington are beginning to show signs of deflation. In 2011, the property tax roll showed that the top 30% of the homes in Barrington paid around 57% of all property taxes. As assessments at the high end shift to lesser values, the lower valued properties have to pick up the slack since the full budget has to be paid. Even if there were a zero budget increase, taxes will be rising on the low end properties, There are unintended consequences to ideological management of our town.
Joel Hellmann January 29, 2013 at 04:03 PM
Actually Gary the 30% reduction seemed to take place on Both the very top and low end of the spectrum. It is the houses in the middle that will pick up the slack
Gary Morse January 29, 2013 at 05:21 PM
Joel, The bottom 30% of homes only pay around 18% of the town budget, so their deflation will have far less impact. At any rate, the new taxes are going to be a shock to residents in the coming years, a big shock. That along with declining home prices.
P. Dulchinos January 29, 2013 at 05:53 PM
Additional affordable rental housing in our community will only exacerbate a worsening municipal budgetary situation. Most of these developments fail to generate sufficient tax revenue to accommodate the additional children they introduce into our educational system. Our town cannot sustain this untenable and asymmetrical relationship.
PatchReader January 29, 2013 at 06:40 PM
Is it not time to move away from the traditional pension plan to something akin to a 401(K)? The risk of "guaranteed" benefits has been demonstrated in Central Falls and less dramatically in other towns. While not as attractive, at least the 401(K) requires the employee & employer to pay into it annually and cannot be taken away (other than by a lousy economy) and there is no kicking the can down the road.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something