.

Council Candidates State Their Case

Five of the six candidates for Barrington Town Council on Nov. 6 gather for a 'forum' put on Wednesday night in Town Hall by the League of Women Voters RI.

Five of Barrington’s six Town Council candidates gathered in the Council Chamber Wednesday evening, Oct. 17, to make a case for being elected in November. The other candidate was in China.

The gathering was a League of Women Voters RI “candidates’ forum” attended by around 75 voters and other candidates for the School Committee and State House seats in District 66 and 67.

Incumbents Kate Weymouth and June Speakman, Democrats who have campaigned together, and Republican challengers Margaret Kane, Don Nessing, and Shirley Applegate-Lockridge, took turns answering or responding to question written on index cards from the floor. Democrat Ann Strong was the candidate who said she could not participate because she is overseas

The format prevented candidates from answering or responding to all of the same questions. A candidate could use, however, a limited number of “wild cards” to weigh in on a certain question. No one used all the wild cards.

Each candidate got two questions to answer or respond to first. There were strict time limits for answers or responses, including for the wild cards.

The overall format, which included opening and closing statements, therefore, did not allow the audience to assess one specifif candidate against another except during four of the 10 questions asked by moderator Scott Pickering, general manager of East Bay Newspapers, which sponsored the forum.

All of the candidates used their opening minute to provide mostly biographical or background information or to focus on a particular issue.

Weymouth, for instance, stressed her 8 years on the Town Council, which, she said, “I feel partly responsible for the record of achievement.” She is an architect.

Speakman, the council president who has served 10 years, talked about making Barrington a more “walkable” town and cooperating with other towns on the provision of certain services. She is a political science professor.

Kane, who serves as the chair of the Senior Services Advisory Committee and the Community Center Task Force, brought up the contentious affordable housing mandate by Rhode Island and the often-criticized signage regulations in Barrington. She is retired from the RI Lung Association.

Nessing, a Barrington mortgage broker, also brought up the affordable housing mandate and a general increase in services.

Applegate-Lockridge, a Barrington attorney, described the town as “well-run. And I want to keep the town a great place to live by stressing fiscal responsibility.”

The 10 questions from the floor covered a wide range of issues, including regionalization and consolidation of services, fiscal management, what initiatives a candidate might champion, the plastic grocery bag ban in Barrington, whether the town should hire a full-time or a part-time recreation director, term limits, the role town councilors should play.

The first question asked: What is the most important issue in Barrington. By the order of seating, Weymouth went first. Her answer was “maintaining a balanced budget.” Speakman had the first chance to respond . She agreed with Weymouth on balancing the budget.

Speakman got the second question, which dealt with consolidation of services.

“Yes, I favor looking at consolidation,” she said. Kane, who got to respond first to the same question, agreed with Speakman that Barrington needs to consider regionalization of some services.

Kane’s primary initiative if elected, question #3, would be to continue pushing for a Barrington community center. Nessing said he would like to continue to be involved in revaluation; he has served on an ad hoc board that handled that issue.

Weymouth used a wild card to say that she wants to push for another community garden and the continued renovation of the Bay Spring Community Center.

On a question about “fiscal restraint,” Nessing said he would use his business experience to “do more with less.” Applegate-Lockridge’s response was to have “fiscal responsibility.”

Speakman weighed in on that question: “We need to continue doing what we have been doing” to come up with “lean and mean budgets.” Weymouth said the Town Council has approved town-side budgets that have gone up only 3 percent in four years – a sure sign of “fiscal restraint.”

Where do you stand on the plastic bag ban?

Applegate-Lockridge said he opposed it at first and still would like see a moratorium to evaluate the impact. Weymouth, the bag ban’s most avid supporter on the Town Council, responded by saying: “We must reduce our dependency on plastic. Everyone should be concerned."

What about term limits?

Speakman is opposed. “Voters must be given the opportunity to vote in or out a candidate,” she said.

“Generally, I support term limits,” said Kane, but a town council might be an exception because it is often difficult to get people to serve on local boards.

What two “fresh ideas” do you have?

Kane got that question first. “I think my primary idea is the community center,” she said, “but we need to keep the seniors in town.” Nessing said he favored a better senior center and somehow turning the affordable housing mandate into senior housing.

What role should a town councilor play in government?

A councilor should be a good listener to all points of view, Nessing said. “It’s important to hear all voices.” Applegate-Lockridge said: “Do well what we do. Be deliberative.” Weymouth used a wild card. “We need to be more than listeners. We need to protect the health, safety and welfare, the well-being of everyone.”

Applegate-Lockridge got the first closing statement. She said: “My slogan is Shirley for all of us. I have no obligations. And I won’t forget West Barrington, where I live, and Bay Spring.”

Nessing stressed that if he is elected he would focus on the “needs of the town.”

Kane said Barrington has had an unbalanced council for too long. “It may not be in our best interests,” she said. She also said: “Change is what we’re about.” She referred to Speakman’s initial decision not to run for re-election because “10 years is long enough.”

Speakman conceded that she did say 10 years is enough before she changed her mind to seek re-election. “I decided that I did not want the things I’ve worked for to unravel,” she said. And we need “policy that is consistent with the needs of our neighbors.”

Weymouth finished by saying: “I am proud of my record,” which has included a decrease in spending, the hiring of a full-time planner, liquor stores, chickens in back yards, the plastic bag ban and the recreation bond, which has led to improvements at playing fields, parks and Barrington Beach

The forum was being broadcast for viewing on Full Channel 9 six times: Oct. 20 at 12:30 pm; Oct. 24 at 8 am; Oct. 29 at 2 pm; Oct. 31 at 8 am, Nov. 3 at 12:30 pm and Nov. 5 – Election Day eve – at 2 pm.

Look for Patch stories to follow on the School Committee and District 66 and 67 candidate forums.

Gary Morse October 18, 2012 at 10:32 AM
The defining issue for Barrington is affordable housing. It's impact on property taxes, and the impact to the destruction of our limited remaining open space, should have demanded that it be one of the questions for the council candidates. The grab bag approach to what questions should be asked needs some review by the League of Women Voters.
Manifold Witness October 18, 2012 at 11:50 AM
Time to get the discussion going, Gary -it does seem that affordable senior housing should be a priority yet Barrington's current government isn't offering responses to concerns on that issue. Our government doesn't seem to hear the call. As Barbara says, election day cometh. The task now? Discussion as to this key question: How do we use our votes to ensure that 3 good candidates get elected to fill the 3 Town Council vacancies? There are so many candidates that Kate & June could wind up winning. So who do we vote for? Here are my choices and why. 1. Ann Strong (D). Ann has served the town well in the past. She is an independent thinker and she seems willing to listen and consider all points of view. 2. Margaret Kane (R). Margaret has great experience and is also known for thoughtful consideration of the issues. Last evening (see Patch article) she indicated that she understands the concerns about the lack of senior housing. 3. Don Nessing (R). Mr. Nessing also indicated that he understands the “affordable” housing issues. I would, however, request that Mr. Nessing light a fire under the Ad Hoc Taxation Committee because they still have work to be done. The resultant Town Council would be made up of 3 Republicans and 2 Democrats. The Republicans, above, seem to be moderate and reasonable. Knowing the personalities and ideals that these folks have, the issues would not necessarily be decided by “party lines” either. Thoughts please.
Joyce October 18, 2012 at 12:37 PM
Looking over Weymouth's " accomplishments" tells me it's time for a change. chickens in back yards? Really how important is that?
Gary Morse October 18, 2012 at 12:38 PM
Interesting list Manifold. As far as the affordable issue being the most important candidate issue, consider some of the arguments being used to appeal the Nockum Hill decision which effectively will hold the town hostage forever to this thing called "affordable housing": - The decision is not consistent with local needs of Barrington and is unreasonable in relation to the town's affordable housing needs. - The Planning Board improperly applied the incorrect version of Barrington's Affordable Housing Plan, and the decision conflicts with the applicable provisions of Barrington's Affordable Housing Plan and Comprehensive Plan. - Barrington is not meeting its affordable housing needs. http://barrington.patch.com/articles/condo-appeal-process-beginning#comments The problem is that our current legal counsel in town also represents the affordable developers and our current town council members see no problem with that conflict. Thus we are setting ourselves up for a disaster if we re-elect the current town council members who seem to want an affordable outcome in Barrington's future.
Lorraine F October 18, 2012 at 01:17 PM
I understand that Councilor Weymouth is trained as an architect, and thus anything that speaks of "built-more", is right up her alley (new affordable housing, Martha Stewart chicken coops). We paid for an architect to do the beach house when in fact there were less expensive proposals from companies that had prefab units to put up. Personally, the beach house looks like a chicken coop. Is there a conspiracy?
Barbara Donovan October 18, 2012 at 02:43 PM
Manifold - how did you know how I was thinking! That is exactly my list ! Let us all join in and get some real things done in town besides bags, beach houses and chickens. I doubt that any of the above help seniors in anyway. Our slogan should be "vote KNS" Get the rally going everybody -- VOTE KNS -- FOR TOWN COUNCIL !!! Barbara Donovan
Manifold Witness October 18, 2012 at 03:22 PM
Okay we have a slate that we can agree on, Barbara. Very good! Next, we need to do the math on this thing. Right now, there are 14,044 registered voters in Barrington and in the 2008 election, somewhere around 9878 Barrington voters went to the polls. The top 3 vote-getters won seats on the town council with the following number of votes: Speakman - 5616 Brenner - 5495 Weymouth – 5454 Our task now? Get 5615 more like-minded voters! And maybe a “Patch” poll. ;-)
Gary Morse October 18, 2012 at 04:13 PM
It's interesting that right after the 2008 election, the Town Council immediately took up the question of property tax abatement's for Sweetbriar, which were approved in a Dec 2, 2008 vote. At the moment, affordable questions by the Housing Board such as the procedures for the size and style uniformity ordinances (section 185-185c) have also been delayed until after the election. I wonder if the 2008 numbers would have been different if residents knew that affordable tax abatement's were the first agenda item by the newly elected council? And I wonder why the Housing Board has now put off discussion on affordable issues until after the election?
Manifold Witness October 18, 2012 at 04:18 PM
It's time to get out and vote like MAD - Margaret, Ann & Don.
Gary Morse October 18, 2012 at 04:37 PM
You can view this Dec 2, 2008 "one agenda" meeting notice for the Sweetbriar property tax abatement at: http://sos.ri.gov/documents/publicinfo/omdocs/notices/4128/2008/65989.pdf This was less than 1 month after the election. Was this by design?
Improving Barrington October 18, 2012 at 05:21 PM
We need to help Kate and June pick up their plastic bags and let folks with real world experience represent our town. Neither of them needs to worry that their most proud accomplishments - chickens, bans on legal plastic bags, and liquor stores (they originally approved 2 for same plaza?!?!?!?!) will unravel without them. Hopefully the next team will not be academics but business people who focus on real life challenges that the citizens can be proud of.
Barbara Donovan October 19, 2012 at 07:55 PM
If each of you who writes, or agrees with what we all think, and sends this information to everyone in town that they know - and then they do the same,the word will get around. I have emailed every person on my list to think hard about this coming election and vote - non-partison for the council. We CANNOT have another repeat of the last few years. The REAL Barrington will disappear. Margaret, Ann and Don ------ for council and NO for bond issue #7 Barbara

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »