patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices

What Are You Going to Do When Plastic Bags Are Gone?

 

It hasn’t happened yet, but I have high hopes that the Reusable Bag Initiative will pass a Town Council vote on Monday, making Barrington the first town in Rhode Island to take this progressive step. There hasn’t been much objection to the proposal, apart from representatives of the plastics industry and those who object on principal to government rule-setting. I believe most people recognize the downside of single-use plastic bags and appreciate a regulatory “nudge” to wean them from this product. 

Since single-use plastic bags were introduced in the 1960s, we’ve become used to them. And while a small portion of bags are recycled, most people reuse them once or twice before disposing of them. So now that single-use plastic bags may be unavailable or at least less available (thank you, Shaw’s; it’s heartening to see this corporate initiative), we need to find replacements.

Replacements to carry purchased products are obvious. Reusable shopping bags are available nearly everywhere, for little money, and most people probably already have a few. However, getting and using reusable shopping bags isn’t the issue;  it’s remembering to bring them to the store. Entering the grocery store empty-handed has been routine for so long that it’s a hard-to-break habit. I first tried to break this habit by storing my reusable bags in the back seat of my car, with mixed results. When, at check-out, I realized I had forgotten the bags, I would take the plastic and vow to recycle. After a while, I would make myself purchase reusable bags at the store every time I forgot my own, hoping that the unnecessary purchase would improve my memory (I’ve so far accumulated about 20 reusable bags). Now, I force myself back to the car to get the bags if I’ve forgotten them, even in the middle of shopping, even at the checkout counter. Do that a few times and it sticks in your head.

What is now working for me is having a RuMe™ bag that I picked up at Barrington Books. It’s a thin, washable polyester bag with shoulder straps and a 50-pound capacity, that rolls up, with a hook and loop closure, into the size of a cell phone. I keep it in my purse at all times, so when I get to check-out and am confronted with bag choices, I have it right there in my purse. Hasn’t failed me yet. There are many other sources of reusable, foldable bags in a variety of materials, colors, and closure types, as a Google search will show. If you’re not a purse-type person, they also make foldable reusable bags with an attached carabiner so you can hang it from your belt loop (but you will need to remember to do this!).

That takes care of shopping, but what about other uses we’ve given to plastic bags? The two most problematic in terms of an adequate substitute are doggie do pick-up duty and garbage bags.

First let me say, emphatically, that all dog owners are absolutely responsible for picking up their dog’s poop. No excuses. That being said, there is no question that dog owners need something to pick up and hold their dog’s droppings until they can dispose of it properly (which does not include flinging it into bushes or stuffing it down a storm drain). If you can’t or won’t deal with dog poop, you shouldn’t have a dog. For those who take their pet owner responsibility seriously, I’ve compiled list of single-use plastic bag replacements:

The Best Options - Ideally, the best option is to use something that is not recyclable and has to be thrown away anyway, including the following:

  • Snack bags made of metallized plastic. (these combined-material bags
    cannot be recycled).
  • Paper canisters with metals tops/bottoms (like Pringles cans).
  • Plastic-coated paper or styrofoam cups (with a top, of course).
  • Coffee bags that are coated with polypropylene film or aluminum (plus they have those little fold-over tabs to close).
  • Tyvek bags (such as used Fedex bags).
  • Refrigerated/frozen food boxes (these plastic-coated paper boxes cannot be recycled).
  • Ice cream containers (good use for those empty Ben and Jerry’s pints).
  • Biodegradable plastic packaging (this will biodegrade only under certain, atypical, conditions, but because it contains additives, it is not recyclable).
  • Recycled plastic film (maybe). Lately I’ve received recycled plastic “airbags” used as packing materials in lieu of foam peanuts that could be cut open and reused. I have not found much information on its recyclability. I suspect that if the recycled plastic is a pure plastic “type”, i.e., 100% polyethylene, may be recyclable again, but if the recycled product is a mix of plastics, it is probably not recyclable. I sent this question to RI Resource Recovery and hope that they will clarify this publicly.

 

Save these items up as you get them, and take them with you on your doggie walks.

Good-But-Not-Great Options.  Because the following materials are recyclable, they are less desirable options for doggie doo duty because you are disposing, rather than recycling, them. But they make good single-use plastic bag substitutes if the above are not to your liking or availability:

  • Cereal boxes liners (which are made of high density polyethylene; #2 plastic, and are now recyclable in ReStore bins).
  • Used plastic sandwich bags. If you send your kids to school with lunch in plastic sandwich bags (a practice you should re-think), have them bring the bags back home and reuse them for doggie doo duty.
  • Produce/seafood plastic protective bags (these are not affected by the Reusable Bag Initiative and will still be available at Shaws).
  • Bread bags, newspaper bags, any other recyclable plastic bag at your disposal.

 

Other, Good-But-Not-Great Options.  If your pet’s production is greater than your cereal or bread consumption, here are some additional ideas, even though they use new materials and may or may not be recyclable:

  • Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) bags - this water-soluble plastic film is used as a dissolvable laundry bag in hospitals, in dishwashing and laundry detergent  “pods”, and, oddly enough, to contain fishing bait. PVA bags are sold as flushable doggie doo bags under brands such as “Flush Puppy”, “Fido’s Flushables”, “The Flushable Bag”, and others, but can be obtained for much cheaper if bought in bulk (check out DissolvoBags.com). A distinct benefit of using PVA bags is that you can flush the doggie doo down the john once you’re home, as long as you un-knot the bag first, rather than tossing in the trash. Even if you do toss them in the trash, at least it's not non-degradable plastic inside of non-degradable plastic.
  • Disposable polyethylene, latex, nitrile, or vinyl gloves (used in food handling, medical examinations, etc). Some of these may have recycled plastic content but, at present, none are recyclable. These are inexpensive and easy to use: grab the offending substance, turn the glove inside out, knot at the wrist, and you’re done, with clean hands. Double-glove if you’re particularly squeamish.

 

As for small garbage bags substitutes, the best strategy is to re-think how you handle household trash rather than buying new garbage bags. Not all waste receptacles require a plastic bag. Wastepaper baskets that are used only for dry waste can be used unlined and washed periodically; designate one waste receptacle only in the house to receive wet waste. If waste receptacle liners are used but are in good shape when it’s time to empty the trash, just empty the contents of the receptacle into a “master” garbage bag and reuse the liner. Or throw everything directly (unbagged) into one large garbage bag in the garage or breezeway.

Another major strategy is to compost all compostable material, such as fruit and vegetable peels and trimmings, eggshells, and coffee grounds. It’s dumb-easy to do and will reduce your garbage volume a great deal. It’s beyond this blog to talk about the dos and don’ts of composting, but if you do it correctly, it won’t smell, it won’t attract rodents, and it will give you (eventually) a great soil amendment. Manufactured compost bins can be bought at most hardware or big box stores (including Job Lot) and are relatively inexpensive this time of year as summer merchandise is being removed. Check out http://www.uri.edu/cels/ceoc/ceoc_programs_mcrp.html and click on “resources” for more information.

So, now you are armed with almost everything you need to meet the challenge of the Reusable Bag Initiative with confidence and verve. Let the Town Council know you are up to this challenge and welcome change!

Manifold Witness

4:26 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012

So, Cyndee would have us believe that, if the ban goes through we should:

get a doctorate in dog poop (and, then, let's be honest, keep using plastic bags),

"throw everything directly (unbagged) into one large garbage bag in the garage or breezeway" (and it will end up all over the street on trash day),

buy& wash reusable shopping bags, and

compost with confidence (but no grass clippings in the compost pile)?

Yeah... No.

Because we can simply shop out-of-town, save time & money, and keep using those free, lightweight grocery bags for dog poop & trash.

Reply

Lorraine F

6:13 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012

Cyndee,

Your comment appears almost comical in view of the poll taken by the Patch itself which showed a total of only 8 people made the effort to vote in favor of this ban. 29 voted against.

http://barrington.patch.com/articles/poll-findings-don-t-ban-plastic-bags

How can you actually believe: "There hasn’t been much objection to the proposal, apart from representatives of the plastics industry and those who object on principal to government rule-setting."

I submit the fact that Shaw's was supposed to launch a trial which hasn't happened, so we have no idea the financial impact.

Nor have you considered the impact to seniors who rely on those small bags with handles. I know many seniors with arthritis and they will miss those bags.

Nor have we tried recycling at our own recycling center.

I'm getting the impression you want to reduce the argument to disgruntled libertarians in order to create the illusion of "ban support", when in truth, the support may only be you and 7 other people.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cyndee Fuller

7:58 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012

Town council has indicate they received a great deal of support for the ban and almost everyone I have personally spoken to is in support of it; I can think of two not in favor. So, including you two, I'm aware of four opposed. Even if 29 are opposed - not a big number.
A few things:
- The bags are not "free"; their cost is incorporated into the overall grocery costs.
- I assume that everyone knows how to close a garbage bag; perhaps I overestimate people.
- Yes, buy and use reusable bags
- Yes compost, even grass clippings, Just mix them well.
- If you want the bags so much, go on ahead and waste the gas to drive out of town.
- As a near-senior with arthritis in my thumbs, I much prefer to have a grocery bag that I can carry on my shoulder to one that digs into my hands. Carrying multiple plastic bags in one hand is painful.
- If you haven't already been recycling your extra bags at the ReStore drop off locations at Shaw's, which has been there for years, I submit that you are part of the problem. I have always recycled what I didn't use.
Disgruntled libertarians? Really? Is this political or environmental?. If you can't change a small habit for the betterment of the environment and your community, then again, you are part of the problem. Time to change with the times.

Comment_arrow

Lorraine F

8:10 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012

You didn't address one of my points being that there is no data on the financial impact to Shaws.

Ready, fire, aim!

Townie

6:24 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

More regulatory oversight, just what citizens need. A silly rule that makes those huge SUV driving folks feel good by forcing their beliefs on others. With all the problems in town (sky high taxes, subsidized housing, poor leadership, etc.) this is the issue? I for one will be shopping at Stop & Shop at least monthly to stock up on the bags that I use for dog walks. Shame on Shaws for caving into the demands of a few.

Reply

TryingForGreen

7:42 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Townie, in the bigger picture, Shaws is not "caving into the demands of a few."

Barrington is far from the first town to consider this. Bags are banned in Seattle, San Francisco, Portland and others. In addition, they are banned in parts of England, India &
Australia. Rwanda, of all places, has a ban on them. Italy, Belgium & Ireland place a fee on the bags, which reduced their use by 94%.

I don't think it's outrageous to consider doing it here.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Gary Morse

8:01 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Your points about others banning plastic bags lacks validity.

The issue on the table is whether there would be a downside to our small town local retailers if indeed residents can drive two miles to go to East Prov, Seekonk, Warren.

There is zero data to show the impact would not be financially harmful. This has the appearance of being a rushed job to simply get it through before a new town council is elected.

It has the hope that Barrington will lead, and others will follow. In these hard financial times, it is more likely the other towns will take the money and run.

Is that responsible public policy?

Comment_arrow

Joel Hellmann

9:40 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Cyndee, come look in the stream on my property see the plastic bags, and the bottles and fast food containers ect. Trying, Other countries ban plastic entirely such as the Journal Piece on Haiti. there is an argument if it covers a large territory and all kinds of plastic. But Barrington is only a few square miles, with other towns that will not follow suit. and plastic bags are a very small part of the problem. the bags are small potatoes. It is just granstanding.

Comment_arrow

Gary Morse

10:35 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Good points Joel!

Comparing places like Los Angeles County to Barrington is a significant stretch.

There is a large part of the population in such areas that consider the environment an annoyance and so an ordinance hammer is needed. I know first hand since I visit my daughter there at least twice a year.

Barrington simply does not fit that profile. Town Council members should try to get all of RI to embrace this first. But RI won't simply because there are much better ways to control our carbon footprint that should be tried first.

This is symbolic only.

Manifold Witness

7:49 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Speaking of "green"- even higher property taxes -

the bag ban will increase property taxes for residential properties.

That bag ban will cause residential property taxes to go even higher because the businesses will appeal and get reduced taxes based upon lost income (income method).

Maybe residential property taxes didn't go up in all those other places that have bag bans but Barrington isn't like those places. Barrington doesn't have proper reval standards.

And under "Newbert", if there are no standards the town can't defend the reval.

Kate & June don't care about any of that.

Reply

Townie

7:56 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

TFG - we can agree to disagree. I see it as one more cost for business in this non-business friendly town. Shaws is caving. Riverside will continue offering plastic bags and a recycle bin for them.

Reply

nan

9:01 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Walking the dog with ice cream containers and cups? I just don't see that happening.

I do appreciate the ideas though. A shopping bag that stashes in your purse, for example.

None of this is appropriate for renters or condo owners, though we're a small portion of the town. No stashing a "master" trashbag. No composting. Whatever goes out, must be bagged in plastic. Period. And for smaller households that means small bags, like shopping bags.

Back when people insisted stores start offering the alternative of paper bags, the stores put up a fuss that paper costs the store more than plastic. Is this still true? I guess they can defray the expense selling us all those re-usable shopping bags (which you can't wash).

Barrington has always been at the forefront of recycling in the state. It was a pilot program back before anyone else was recycling. I believe people can change their habits because I've grown up seeing it happen - without laws, btw.

Thank you for some good ideas I hadn't considered. But I do hope I can still lay hands on small plastic bags without buying commercial trashbags.

Reply

Manifold Witness

9:01 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Cynthia Fuller is Chairwoman of the Barrington Conservation Commission.

In June Speakman's proposed bag ban ordinance, it states that the Conservation Commission recommended the bag ban.

http://www.ci.barrington.ri.us/conservation-comm.php

http://clerkshq.com/content/Attachments/barrington-ri/121001_17.pdf?clientSite=barrington-ri

Reply

nan

9:07 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

P.S. I believe incentives work better than legal bans and fines. CVS has bag tags. Every 4x you use your own bag, you get a $1 coupon. Whole Foods gives a 5c discount for every bag of your own you use. And elsewhere I've been charged a small fee for the privilege of plastic. I don't mind paying the occasional 10c extra for a bag I'll use. And Shaws keeps the stash of recycled bags right by the entrance where you can grab a few going in. Alll of these ideas work to change habits.

Reply

Gary Morse

9:09 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Cyndee,

As a dedicated environmentalist, why have you been totally silent on the environmental disaster that is Barrington's "ordinance demanded" 10% affordable housing build-out across town?

Did you know:

1) A typical affordable deed restriction will only last for 30 years by town ordinance, and then we start all over again with more build out (e.g. the Sweetbriar lease can be converted at 30 years in spite of it being a 99 year lease),

2) Due to the town's development rule of 2 affordable homes for every 10 non affordable homes, it could take another 4000 new homes in town before we mathematically cross over the 10% ordinance threshold. As a "math nerd" (your description), you can confirm the truth of these numbers.

3) The towns Housing Board of Trustees have no substantive plan to rehab homes vs new construction.

4) When the town fought the Sweetbriar case in court several years ago, the town never raised the issue that the statutes are unclear as to how to count affordable homes in any town. RI Housing itself admits that this is an issue that must be settled in the courts.

As a conservationist, I would think you would be all over this. I am surprised by your lack of involvement or opinion on this critical environmental issue.

Reply

Marie McFarland

9:46 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

As far as being politically correct with poop -- let's face it, most of us never imagined standing and having a conversation with someone while holding a bag of dog poop and not feeling weird or obvious. With that said, however, I have come across biodegradable dog poop bags sold in various places. Yes you may be spening money on them, but thy are small, convenient and you don't have to put so much thought into it. I have always tried to go the extra mile where and when I can so that our grandchildren don't have to live i a world where they have to wear masks of any sort to survive outside. I know a slight exaggeration, but you get my point. Also, just because cars don't come with ashtrays any longer does not mean the acceptable alternative i to throw the butt out the window. I go nuts when I see this on the highway. My partner is a smoker and he always brings his butts home and/or in the house from a walk. I have NEVER seen him just thow them on the ground. Come on people -- just think a little bit!

Reply

Gary Morse

10:03 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Marie,

I do think people in Barrington think harder on these issues. This ban has described residents as needing environmental awareness when I don't believe they do.

Case in point is the accusation that our rivers are "clogged" with plastic bags. The truth is that I have lived on 100 Acre Cove in two different locations on the cove for 26 years where the wind blows constantly into the shoreline. Even shotgun casings will occasionally wash ashore from the duck hunters on the other side of the cove.

According to the proponents, my shoreline should be a dump.

In 26 years, there has never been even a minor problem with plastic bags. In this entire summer, I watched and saw not one single bag wash in.

This is largely symbolic.

Reply

Kelly

11:24 am on Monday, October 1, 2012

Know your facts. Reusable shopping bags have a negative impact on the environment unless they are used 171 times. People do not use their bag this number of times because they get a new more "stylish" bag, the handles break, it gets dirty, and then the reusable bag does not meet the criteria for being and environmentally savvy alternative to plastic. The plastic is easily recycled or reused. Reduce, reuse, recycle. Not more manufacturing to create new discardable products we really don't need. Here is a study, get the facts before you jump into something which causes more harm than good. http://blog.seattlepi.com/thebigblog/2011/03/02/study-plastic-grocery-bags-better-than-canvas/

Reply

Leave a comment