Water Board Seeking 12% Rate Hike
The Bristol County Water Authority board will hold a public hearing next Thursday, Dec. 20, to explain the need for a double-digit rate hike and gather feedback on its plans for the water system over the next 5 years.
The Bristol County Water Authority board will be asking for feedback next week at a public hearing on a proposed 12 percent across-the-board rate hike for all users.
The hearing will be held in the Warren Town Hall on Thursday evening, Dec. 20. It starts at 6 pm.
To support the rate hike, the board will lay out its new 5-year strategic, financial and capital plans. It needs a significant increase in revenue over the next five years to accomplish those plans, which will upgrade the entire water system and create a backup supply.
The double-digit rate hike for the next fiscal year is just the first of more rate hikes to come. At this point in time, the capital plan calls for at least 12 percent more in revenue next year and 16 percent in additional revenue or 4 percent a year over the final four years of the plan.
The rate increases in subsequent years have yet to be determined, said Pamela Marchand, executive director of the water authority, and Allan Klepper, chairman of the board. They may not line up exactly with the annual boosts in revenue.
But the rates are expected to be significantly smaller in size after next year, with rate increases varying depending on the a rate design that will cut the number of individual tiers and do away with a senior discount.
The only certain rate hike is the 12 percent boost that will go before ratepayers at the public hearing next Thursday, Marchand and Klepper both said.
The board plans to explain exactly what needs to be done to the water system to keep distributing high-quality water and how it plans to do it and pay for it.
The board listened to a final report on Wednesday evening from the consultant hired to do a rate study, Municipal & Financial Services Group of Annapolis Md.
The consultant recommended the 12 percent rate hike while maintaining the current rate design for one year and then a switching to an alternative design that will include a basic serve charge, fewer usage tiers, separate rates for commercial/industrial and municipal users, and no discount for customers over age 65.
The current rate structure has a service charge, five usage tiers and the discounted rate for older customers. The water authority’s current billing system, which is being replaced, simply cannot produce bills for the alternate design, said the consultants.
Marchand said she supports the overall recommendation because it is based on the “cost of service.”
Even with a 12 percent rate hike, though, the consultant estimated, a customer who uses 1,500 cubic feet of water a year will see only a $12.26 boost in cost under the current design. More or less usage of water, of course, will change that annual cost.
Gary Morse
7:34 am on Thursday, December 13, 2012
The issue for rate payers is not the size of the rate hike, but whether the local distribution network will finally be attended to using the added funds.
For the past two decades, management did not give proper attention to the care and maintenance of our local distribution network, and now it needs lots of attention, and lots of money.
The question is not the size of the increase, but instead, how will BCWA management deliver on the needed upgrades.
The new BCWA website, also previewed last night, provides exactly the kind of vehicle to keep rate payers up to date on what they are getting for their money.
In the moment
7:56 am on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Gary, you're always the voice of reason and balance. But once again, this sounds like paying for other peoples mistakes, which I abhor. If they have to move ahead with this hike, wish they could break up into smaller increments. Many households arealready stretched to breaking point.
Gary Morse
9:46 am on Thursday, December 13, 2012
LM,
The issue has now become a health concern in our fragile water distribution network. For years, rate payers were not told the full truth about how far into disrepair our local distribution network had become.
The recent "plan" for BCWA was statutorily mandated in 1993 under the Bristol County Water Supply Act. How BCWA legally maneuvered around doing a strategic plan for the past 19 years is the legacy of prior BCWA management and their attorney, Sandra Mack.
We are at the point where we can no longer delay "changing the cars motor oil", whether we can afford it or not. Delay will ultimately cost us more, and create more health concerns.
For that reason, I support a rate increase with the conditions that BCWA begin accounting best-practices to break out for rate payers the costs of: Production, Distribution, Administration.
Management also has to be annually measured on accomplishing specific written goals and objectives, something that has in the past never happened.
Please volunteer
8:09 am on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Given the large amount of updating needed and system neglect in previous years (or is it decades?) a $12 per year increase seems quite reasonable.
Gina
9:23 am on Thursday, December 13, 2012
@Please Volunteer...it's 12%...not $12
Barbara Donovan
5:15 pm on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Sadly, another way to disable the seniors - now they may flee Bristol County !!
Please volunteer
7:36 am on Friday, December 14, 2012
Gina: I quote the article "Even with a 12 percent rate hike, though, the consultant estimated, a customer who uses 1,500 cubic feet of water a year will see only a $12.26 boost in cost under the current design. More or less usage of water, of course, will change that annual cost."
So... From the article, just about $12 it seems like...
I would have thought this might be per quarter, but then the article is not explaining it correctly.